Last years nostalgia was better.— sal denaro (@sdenaro) April 25, 2015
Last years nostalgia was better.— sal denaro (@sdenaro) April 25, 2015
People are wearing acid wash jeans again? Fashion or irony, can't tell.— sal denaro (@sdenaro) April 24, 2015
Cultural capital—what “privilege” often, but not always, refers to these days—is a seductive concept. It tells us that the rich stay rich through the discreet perpetuation of cultural preferences. Privilege isn’t just money or luxury goods; it’s also about the foods you eat, the shows you watch. When you first learn about it, likely in Sociology 101, cultural capital can seem like a way to explain everything. The problem, however, is that landlords, health providers, and universities don’t accept cultural capital in lieu of monetary payment.
Privilege is a bad argument. Whenever I’ve asked how “checking privilege” somehow leads to individual or collective action that affects positive change, the answer is always hand waving and platitudes.
Advocates of an Elizabeth Warren presidential campaign are bordering on stalking. The lady said no, now back off.— sal denaro (@sdenaro) April 22, 2015
The Donald Trump Super-PAC should be called "Citizens for Funding a Failed Vanity Campaign"— sal denaro (@sdenaro) April 22, 2015
Are the Rand Paul supporters whining about political dynasties aware of his dad Ron Paul and decades he spent campaigning?— sal denaro (@sdenaro) April 18, 2015
The fact that Cato and Reason both reacted so swiftly is a testament to the central place Spencer holds in the development of libertarian thought. According to Rothbard, who the elder Paul describes as the “founder of the modern libertarian movement,” Spencer’s Social Statics is the “greatest single work of libertarian political philosophy ever written.” Yet this foundational libertarian text does not say what Root and Cato claim that it said. Indeed, if Social Statics is, indeed, the “greatest single work of libertarian political philosophy ever written” then that is the most damning indictment of libertarianism imaginable.
This is why it’s a waste of time to argue with libertarians. Both Cato and Reason just flat out denied the text of the book said what it clearly says.
This is exactly how Reason reacted to being called out of publishing Holocaust denials. The PDFs are online but they claim they didn’t publish what you can clearly see they published.
Why not admit you were wrong; apologize and move on?
Spencer’s own philosophy can safely be described as genocidal libertarianism. In Social Statics, the book Rothbard raises up as the “greatest single work of libertarian political philosophy ever written,” Spencer argues that “[i]nconvenience, suffering, and death are the penalties attached by nature to ignorance, as well as to incompetence.” They are also, he adds, “the means of remedying” these traits. “By weeding out those of lowest development” Spencer explained, “nature secures the growth of a race who shall both understand the conditions of existence, and be able to act up to them… . Nature demands that every being shall be self-sufficing. All that are not so, nature is perpetually withdrawing by death.” Rather than proving nature’s cruelty, Spencer believed that this deadly game “purif[ied] society from those who are, in some respect or other, essentially faulty.” If a man or woman is “sufficiently complete to live,” then they should live. But if “they are not sufficiently complete to live, they die, and it is best they should die.” Needless to say, Spencer saw no place for what he labeled “[a]cts of parliament to save silly people.”
The good old days when libertarians didn’t bother to pretend to care about the poor. These days they pretend that government programs are the cause of poverty. Because poverty didn’t exist in pre-new deal America. And something-something didn’t you read Atlas Shrugged?
The standard defense of this is to claim that that isn’t libertarianism or to claim a straw man. Or that the free market magic will somehow prevent this.
We’ve been known to engage in an iOS vs. Android debate from time to time, but they tend to end without issue. The same can’t be said for a recent argument between two roommates in Tulsa. Two men r…
“It was only supposed to be a white thing but people read more into it than that,” Boggess wrote on his GoFundMe page about his sign.
Right wing victim narrative.
If polling is to be believed ~20% of independents will vote for Hillary despite holding unfavorable opinion of her.— sal denaro (@sdenaro) April 17, 2015
It looks like the gold bubble is over and the price will be back to the pre-crisis trend line about the same time that the economy, unemployment and other metrics reach the pre-crisis trend lines. So it’s time to dust off the greatest.quote.about.gold.EVER.
Today the world’s gold stock is about 170,000 metric tons. If all of this gold were melded together, it would form a cube of about 68 feet per side. (Picture it fitting comfortably within a baseball infield.) At $1,750 per ounce — gold’s price as I write this — its value would be about $9.6 trillion. Call this cube pile A.
Let’s now create a pile B costing an equal amount. For that, we could buy all U.S. cropland (400 million acres with output of about $200 billion annually), plus 16 Exxon Mobils (the world’s most profitable company, one earning more than $40 billion annually). After these purchases, we would have about $1 trillion left over for walking-around money (no sense feeling strapped after this buying binge). Can you imagine an investor with $9.6 trillion selecting pile A over pile B?
Beyond the staggering valuation given the existing stock of gold, current prices make today’s annual production of gold command about $160 billion. Buyers — whether jewelry and industrial users, frightened individuals, or speculators — must continually absorb this additional supply to merely maintain an equilibrium at present prices.
A century from now the 400 million acres of farmland will have produced staggering amounts of corn, wheat, cotton, and other crops — and will continue to produce that valuable bounty, whatever the currency may be. Exxon Mobil XOM -1.37% will probably have delivered trillions of dollars in dividends to its owners and will also hold assets worth many more trillions (and, remember, you get 16 Exxons). The 170,000 tons of gold will be unchanged in size and still incapable of producing anything. You can fondle the cube, but it will not respond.
It has a 3rd wing that is retracted into the body of the aircraft when not needed. (via The Force Is Strong With This Star Wars Themed Dreamliner)
Hitting two rands with one stone,
if you’re a Christian or a white man in the USA, it’s open season on you. Therefore, Hillary Clinton has an advantage
Right wing victim mentality in action.
A Facebook poke is like walking up someone and saying, hey you! Pay attention to me! Entertain me! Dance, monkey, dance!— sal denaro (@sdenaro) April 14, 2015
Hillary announces sun to rise in east, set in west.— sal denaro (@sdenaro) April 12, 2015
Apple's new Photos app on Yosemite is stunningly mediocre. But it will cooperate with Lightroom if you tell it not to import photos.— sal denaro (@sdenaro) April 12, 2015
If I’m ever on life support unplug me and then plug me back in again and see if that works.— Bill Murray (@BiIIMurray) April 8, 2015
Paul said that in his vision for America, “Any law that disproportionately incarcerates people of color is repealed.” The problem is that that describes pretty much every law that incarcerates a lot of people in America — the nonviolent drug offenses Paul often rails against, sure, but also violent crimes and property crimes.
For those playing at home, Mr. Paul just called for adjusting the law based on the race of the accused. Let’s see if libertarians call him out on this. My guess is no.
Yawning is our body's way of saying "10% of battery remaining."— Bill Murray (@BiIIMurray) April 7, 2015
Former Texas Governor Rick Perry, former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee, former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum, and neurosurgeon Ben Carson are just a few of the men thought to be considering squandering time and money pursuing an office that they will never occupy in a billion years.